Summer is the season of growth, but it's also peak season for plant pathogens. One notorious threat to crops is Fusarium. This fungal pathogen thrives in the same warm, humid conditions that encourage high-yield production. Whether you're growing wheat in the Prairies or peppers in greenhouses, Fusarium can silently devastate your crops if you're not vigilant.
|
Crop |
Year |
Estimated Losses |
|
Greenhouse Peppers |
2024 |
Approximately 400 acres lost in Ontario due to F. oxysporum |
|
Corn (Stalk/Ear Rot) |
2024 |
3.7% yield loss in Ontario, totaling approximately 0.4 billion bushels |
|
Wheat (Root & Head Rot) |
2023 – 2024 |
27% yield loss in Alberta and Ontario combined, contributing to $1.8B USD in regional damage |
|
Potatoes (Dry Rot) |
2023 |
Up to 25% post-harvest losses in some seed lots and storage facilities |
Canadian Crop Losses from Fusarium (2022 to 2024)
Fusarium isn't just a theoretical threat. It has already cost Canadian growers millions of dollars in recent years. This broad host range makes Fusarium a persistent and evolving threat across multiple farming systems (McMullen et al., 2012).
Greenhouses provide optimal growing conditions for fusarium which makes them especially susceptible. Below are some of the main environmental concerns in regards to growth of fusarium:
In Ontario’s greenhouse pepper industry, researchers identified 48 unique strains of Fusarium oxysporum in recent samples (Gagnon & Ewen, 2023). These strains can wipe out entire sections of crops, especially if early symptoms are missed.
These signs can be mistaken for abiotic stress. For confirmation, PCR-based or lab plating diagnostics are essential.
Pathogens like Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium graminearum do not respect political borders. The agricultural relationship between Canada and the United States is deeply intertwined, especially in field crops (wheat, corn, and soybeans) and greenhouse produce (peppers, tomatoes, and herbs). This interconnectedness raises critical concerns about pathogen transmission, particularly in the context of climate change and intensive monoculture systems.
Fusarium can move between regions in several ways:
Canada’s rising Fusarium losses pose a tangible risk to American agriculture:
Shared biosecurity priorities: The USDA and CFIA have ongoing agreements to collaborate on phytosanitary measures, but soil-borne pathogens like Fusarium require updated focus, especially for greenhouse operations with shared suppliers (CFIA, 2021).
| Task | Why It’s Critical |
| Conduct crop scouting weekly | Early detection allows containment before full outbreak |
| Sanitize tools and systems | Reduces spread via surfaces and workers |
| Monitor environmental factors | Prevents conditions that favor Fusarium germination |
| Schedule lab testing | Confirms presence before symptoms escalate |
| Introduce biocontrols | Enhances root zone resilience and microbial balance |
| Isolate and destroy infected material | Minimizes spread across production zones |
Fusarium is one of the most persistent and destructive plant pathogens in Canadian agriculture. With a rising number of strains, climate-adaptive behavior, and economic fallout that stretches beyond national borders, it demands attention, especially in the summer when environmental conditions are ideal for outbreaks.
Whether you manage field crops, greenhouse operations, or integrated systems, now is the time to act. Proactive testing, clean growing practices, and informed crop management can protect not just this season’s harvest but your long-term profitability.
If you need support with Fusarium testing, biocontrol planning, or greenhouse sanitation protocols, we are here to help.
Aboukhaddour, R., & Harding, M. W. (2023). Cereal diseases: Fusarium root, crown, and foot rots. Government of Alberta. https://www.alberta.ca/cereal-diseases-fusarium-root-crown-foot-rots
Bainard, J. D., et al. (2024). Economic impact of Fusarium head blight in Canada: A multi-year analysis. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 46(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2023.2254187
Bainard, J. D., Etienne, G., & Roberts, K. (2024). Economic impact of Fusarium head blight in Canada: A multi-year analysis. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 46(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2023.2254187
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. (2021). CFIA plant health agreements and international standards. https://inspection.canada.ca/plant-health/international
Gagnon, L., & Ewen, C. (2023). Fusarium management in greenhouse peppers. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca
Hwang, S. F., et al. (2014). Fusarium dry rot of potato. Alberta Agriculture and Forestry. https://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca
McMullen, M., et al. (2012). Fusarium head blight (scab) of small grains. North Dakota State University Extension Service. https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/ag-hub/publications/fusarium-head-blight-scab-small-grains
Schmale, D. G., & Bergstrom, G. C. (2003). Fusarium head blight (FHB) pathogen dispersal in the atmosphere. Phytopathology, 93(11), 1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.11.1137
Stanghellini, M. E., & Rasmussen, S. L. (1994). Hydroponics: A solution for zoosporic pathogens. Plant Disease, 78(12), 1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-1129
University of Florida IFAS Extension. (2020). Beneficial microbes for plant disease suppression. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN1029
Windels, C. E. (2000). Economic and social impacts of Fusarium head blight: Changing farms and rural communities in the Northern Great Plains. Phytopathology, 90(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.1.17
Crippin, T. et al. (2019). Comparing genotype and chemotype of Fusarium graminearum from cereals in Ontario, Canada. PLOS ONE 14(5): e0216735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216735